Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-PA) skewers Elaine Donnelly on gays in the military (UPDATED)

Liar, thy name is Elaine.

This video is so awesome. There were hearings today on whether or not to repeal the ban on gays serving openly in the military, and testifying for the God Hates Fags crowd was Elaine Donnelly, an unqualified woman from a group that calls itself the “Center for Military Readiness.” Ms. Donnelly really, really hates gay people for some reason, as she is one of those choice few that actually is wasting her life fighting against our happiness.

Things got a little bit sticky for Old Elaine, though, when Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-PA), a young dashing Iraq War Veteran, started asking her exactly why she has so little confidence in the professionalism of the United States Military, that they somehow wouldn’t be able to handle serving along people of a different sexual orientation:


(h/t Box Turtle)

It’s nice watching a bigot get skewered, isn’t it?

For the record, our troops don’t have any problem serving alongside gay people (and this is from the National Review, and when the National Review concedes a point, you know the bigots on the far right have officially lost):

A December 18, 2006 Zogby poll of 545 GIs who served in Iraq and Afghanistan found that 73 percent considered themselves comfortable among gays. Also, 23 percent said they knew gay people in their units, while 45 percent believed they did. So, 68 percent of GIs confirmed or imagined that they worked with gay colleagues, with no evident clamor for their ejection. If there is a gay-fueled crisis in unit morale and cohesion, it appears to have gone undetected.

Because we are very sneaky. SHHHHHH!

Anyway.

UPDATE: Haha, Dana Milbank ripped Elaine Donnelly a new one in the Washington Post today in a piece called “Sorry We Asked, Sorry, You Told.” This is absolutely hilarious:

Don’t ask, don’t tell. And, whatever you do, don’t ask Elaine Donnelly to tell you what she thinks about gays in the military.

The House Armed Services personnel subcommittee made just such a miscalculation yesterday. Holding the first hearing in 15 years on the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, lawmakers invited a quartet of veterans to testify on the subject and also extended an invitation to Donnelly, who has been working for years to protect our fighting forces from the malign influence of women.

Oh yeah, in case you didn’t know that Elaine Donnelly is a representative of the God Hates Women set, too. Self-hatred all around. Milbank continued:

Donnelly treated the panel to an extraordinary exhibition of rage. She warned of “transgenders in the military.” She warned that lesbians would take pictures of people in the shower. She spoke ominously of gays spreading “HIV positivity” through the ranks.

“We’re talking about real consequences for real people,” Donnelly proclaimed. Her written statement added warnings about “inappropriate passive/aggressive actions common in the homosexual community,” the prospects of “forcible sodomy” and “exotic forms of sexual expression,” and the case of “a group of black lesbians who decided to gang-assault” a fellow soldier.

At the witness table with Donnelly, retired Navy Capt. Joan Darrah, a lesbian, rolled her eyes in disbelief. Retired Marine Staff Sgt. Eric Alva, a gay man who was wounded in Iraq, looked as if he would explode.

Oh no, it’s a lesbian! And she has a waterproof camera! OH NOOOOOOO!

Of course Milbank goes on to point out that, as is increasingly becoming the case when Elaine Donnelly or any of her gasbag colleagues open their mouths, Donnelly’s testimony actually had the “opposite of [its] intended effect.” That’s why I love it when these retards are given platforms and microphones. People who had never heard of them before and weren’t previously emotionally invested in the issues suddenly realize what hateful twits the anti-gay lobby are, and it brings people over to the cause of equality and fairness:

Inadvertently, Donnelly achieved the opposite of her intended effect. Though there’s no expectation that Congress will repeal “don’t ask, don’t tell” and allow gays to serve openly in the military, the display had the effect of increasing bipartisan sympathy for the cause.

Rep. Vic Snyder (D-Ark.) labeled her statement “just bonkers” and “dumb,” and he called her claims about an HIV menace “inappropriate.” Said Snyder: “By this analysis . . . we ought to recruit only lesbians for the military, because they have the lowest incidence of HIV in the country.”

And that, Elaine Donnelly, is called using your argument against you.

Funniest passage in the Milbank piece:

But it was Donnelly, founder and president of the Center for Military Readiness, who amused lawmakers the most. Snyder asked Darrah about Donnelly’s reference to “passive-aggressive actions common in the homosexual community,” saying, “I’m almost tempted to ask you to demonstrate.”

Oh, whiat a wonderful spectacle.

Read Milbank’s entire piece. I hope that, somewhere in dark hole, Elaine Donnelly is curled up in a fetal position today. Unlikely, I know. The insane don’t really give up when they’ve been proven insane. They just double down…

11 Responses to “Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-PA) skewers Elaine Donnelly on gays in the military (UPDATED)”

  1. I was so angry when I read the Washington Post article. Really, I was shaking. I don’t understand how people can be so hateful. The disgusting thing is that people think they are doing God’s work by spewing this shit. I am glad to see that this person and others like her are being shown for what they really are. As hard as it is, I am going to pray for her. :)

  2. Yeah, I’ll pray she stubs her taint.

  3. [...] Stewart vs. Elaine Donnelly’s pathetic pink triangle I wrote here about Elaine Donnellly’s asinine performance the other day in the hearings on the efficacy of [...]

  4. I’m sorry, I must have missed this post when it first came out.
    As a former democrat, former supporter of Barack Obama (who Murphy sold his soul to), and a guy who actually voted for Patrick Murphy, I gotta speak out.
    The fact that you used this moron to try to make your point is laughable. How much taxpayer’s money did he spend on his gay lover?
    Look, I couldn’t care less what two degenerate homos do in the privacy of their own bedrooms, but STEALING MONEY IS A CRIME!!!

  5. Wow, I didn’t know you were a fucking homophobe.

    How’s life in the dark ages?

  6. If Patrick Murphy wants to spend HIS money on his gay lover, the only person who would have a right to be angry would be his wife. But he’s spending TAXPAYERS’ money for an elicit affair.
    Dark ages? The Constitution was written in the 1700’s not the dark ages…

  7. Jesus Christ.

    That’s cool, if you want to interpret the Constitution based on a 18th century understanding of science and reality, that’s fine. Not many people admit it, but that’s cool.

    Meanwhile, three centuries later, after the industrial revolution, after the most stunning scientific advances in human history, the rest of us will live accordingly.

    Oh, and the word you’re looking for is “illicit.” “Elicit” is a verb.

    As in, “When you say homophobic things, it elicits visceral, piteous, and disgusted feelings in the blog author.”

  8. It’s like we’re speaking in different languages. Sorry for the misspelling.
    My one and only problem with Patrick Murphy – my Congressman, who I actually VOTED for, is that he broke the law, by stealing money. According to the Constitution, that’s a bad thing. What that has to do with the dark ages or being homophobic is beyond me.
    I don’t care if he spent the money on a gay lover or a straight lover. The point is, he spent it on a gay lover – I’m sorry, I can’t change that.
    If a gay person breaks the law, is he not just as guilty as a straight person?
    I honestly don’t understand you on this one.

  9. Um, the quote that pissed me off was:

    “Look, I couldn’t care less what two degenerate homos do in the privacy of their own bedrooms, but STEALING MONEY IS A CRIME!!!”

    And regardless of Murphy’s record, which you know better than I do (though I question your judgment, as you call yourself a “former Obama supporter”), he did an amazing job, along with several other representatives, of verbally skewering the hell out of the bigot Elaine.

  10. [...] Fundamentalist Christians! Seriously. No, thank YOU. And waste-of-space Elaine Donnelly wants to keep fucking it up. (Jon Stewart’s take on Elaine Donnelly is here, in case you missed [...]

Leave a Reply